You could always go with a fresh set from Sudco. They are basically a bolt on deal. We just put a set on a 78 750 Bonne at work, and they brought it to life.
What ever dude !!! Amals rule you just have to be smarter then them .F.U.Jay said:I like my Mikuni setup from MAP on my 69 TR666... Its basicly the same Sudco setup that Copper is talking about...But it comes with a shortend manifold.. But i will admit I had to change the needle and shave the slide a little... She rides like a raped ape now... FUCK AMELS!!!!
If you're problems are low down, rejet and reduce the cut away, I prefer Mikunis they are easier to set up and balance.76tri said:Thanks guys, has anyone else had any experience with Amals? Would changing the slides have that much affect on leaning out the bottom end?
Then I guess im a TOTAL dumb ass,,,Mine was such a bitch,,,Ran lean as shit no matter what I did,,,Plus the fuel valve stuck all the time,to the point I had to keep a tiny screw driver to dig it out of the body...gas would dribble like a drunk on NEW YEARS EVE....Trumpnut said:What ever dude !!! Amals rule you just have to be smarter then them .
ok, I was confused when you first posted : "... MK II carbs and can not get them enough," but I see now, wet at low-end.76tri said:So now i am totally confused, One guy i talked to said slides, the next guy says mains, Any idea's? my mains seem to be spot on, top runs great, pulls hard, will reducing them help rid my bike of the low end richness?
.........................................................................ok so I cant get the table to line up, you can figger it out. http://www.t140.com/views/mk2.html |
TOUCHY !!!!F.U.Jay said:Then I guess im a TOTAL dumb ass,,,Mine was such a bitch,,,Ran lean as shit no matter what I did,,,Plus the fuel valve stuck all the time,to the point I had to keep a tiny screw driver to dig it out of the body...gas would dribble like a drunk on NEW YEARS EVE....
Nice ink,,,, I'll stick with the Mik,,, and maybe go get a bigger tattoo also JK